"...the worst are full of passionate intensity"
--T. S. Eliot
Coincidental to this weekend's gun-nut riot in Virginia, I've been reading about, and the writings and sermons of, the 17th-century Puritans. While trying to parse their reasoning so colorfully expressed with great unreasoning abandon, they still seem to me to be truly frightening. And as we can today see, they may have exchanged their tall hats and wide white collars for baseball caps and t-shirts scrawled with crazy stuff, they're still with us.
Those Puritans were rightly outraged by their contemporary kings (James I & II, Charles I, and Louis XIV) claiming divine right to do whatever they wished to anyone. But their furious reaction was about as useful to mankind as the Nazis' later face-off with the Reds. For all the self-righteous noise and bloodshed, extremism is the wrecking ball of history. But like an eternal pendulum, it swings from one extreme to another over the centuries, spending only a brief time in the calm middle.
And extremist doctrines, which inspire such fanatical crowds and movements, are usually based on pretty much nothing. Think of Ayn Rand's system of "Objectivism," which is nothing at all but a mirror image of the "collectivist," or communist, dogma it opposes. Each far end of that pendulum's swing is just so, a false opposition, a big con, just a mirror image. This is the foolishness of believing in ALL OR NOTHING. So why is such a dangerous approach so attractive to so many?
I recently read a twelve-page summary of a paper presented at an academic conference. It tried to explain people's responses to public stimuli in media and their behaviors. But it was all statistics and groupings; I came away wondering why personality types were not considered. Nature or nurture predominate in some people, but for most it's a mixture, And we've found how much brain chemistry controls that nature. So you inherit that and usually will believe and act like your family, group and community. Even in cases where outwardly it looks like you do not. That explains Reagan Democrats, for one example: a basically conservative nature from rural roots despite the urban work setting and union card.
So one thing is pretty constant in human nature, and that is: people go too far. Some would say that's the spirit that leads people to explore and discover, but think about the bodies and trash on Mt. Everest and the destruction of the New World's population and forests. Not that we all should stay home in our huts and do nothing, but don't do 85 in a pickup truck on an icy road, either.